<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Dependencies on PHP Boy Scout</title><link>https://blog-570662.gitlab.io/tags/dependencies/</link><description>Recent content in Dependencies on PHP Boy Scout</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-gb</language><copyright>Matt Cockayne</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog-570662.gitlab.io/tags/dependencies/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The blank import that keeps a dependency out of your binary</title><link>https://blog-570662.gitlab.io/the-blank-import-that-keeps-a-dependency-out-of-your-binary/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog-570662.gitlab.io/the-blank-import-that-keeps-a-dependency-out-of-your-binary/</guid><description>&lt;img src="https://blog-570662.gitlab.io/the-blank-import-that-keeps-a-dependency-out-of-your-binary/cover-the-blank-import-that-keeps-a-dependency-out-of-your-binary.png" alt="Featured image of post The blank import that keeps a dependency out of your binary" /&gt;&lt;p&gt;go-tool-base can stash your credentials in the OS keychain, which most people building on it are perfectly happy about. But some of them ship into regulated and air-gapped environments where the binary isn&amp;rsquo;t &lt;em&gt;permitted&lt;/em&gt; to contain keychain or session-bus code at all&amp;hellip; not dormant, not unused, simply not there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I had a feature most users want and a minority must be able to provably not have. The way I ended up solving it is one of my favourite little bits of honest Go.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="a-feature-some-users-have-to-be-able-to-not-have"&gt;A feature some users have to be able to &lt;em&gt;not have&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;go-tool-base needs somewhere to keep secrets: AI provider keys, VCS tokens, the occasional app password. The best home for those on a developer&amp;rsquo;s machine is the operating system&amp;rsquo;s own keychain. macOS Keychain, GNOME Keyring or KWallet on Linux via the Secret Service, Windows Credential Manager. So I wanted go-tool-base to support all three. (This is the keychain mode I mentioned back in the &lt;a class="link" href="https://blog-570662.gitlab.io/where-should-a-cli-keep-your-api-keys/" &gt;credentials post&lt;/a&gt;, finally getting the explanation I promised it.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Go library for that is &lt;a class="link" href="https://github.com/zalando/go-keyring" target="_blank" rel="noopener"
 &gt;&lt;code&gt;go-keyring&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, and it&amp;rsquo;s good. The catch is what it drags in behind it. On Linux it talks to the Secret Service over D-Bus, which means &lt;code&gt;godbus&lt;/code&gt;. On Windows it pulls &lt;code&gt;wincred&lt;/code&gt;. Perfectly reasonable dependencies for a desktop tool.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now here&amp;rsquo;s the constraint that made this interesting. Some of the people building tools on go-tool-base don&amp;rsquo;t ship to developer laptops. They ship into regulated sectors and air-gapped deployments where a security review will scan the binary, enumerate every dependency, and ask pointed questions about anything that does inter-process communication. For those builds, &amp;ldquo;the keychain code is there but we never call it&amp;rdquo; is not an acceptable answer. The reviewer&amp;rsquo;s position, and it&amp;rsquo;s a fair one, is that code which isn&amp;rsquo;t in the binary cannot be a finding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I had a feature that most users want, and a minority of users must be able to provably &lt;em&gt;not have&lt;/em&gt;. Same framework, same release.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="why-i-didnt-reach-for-a-build-tag"&gt;Why I didn&amp;rsquo;t reach for a build tag
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;The obvious Go answer is a build tag. Compile with &lt;code&gt;-tags keychain&lt;/code&gt; to get it, leave the tag off to not. I started down that road. I even spent a while on an inverted version, a &lt;code&gt;nokeychain&lt;/code&gt; tag, on the theory that the regulated build should be the one that has to ask, so a forgotten flag fails safe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It works. It also isn&amp;rsquo;t very nice. Build tags are invisible at the call site. Nothing in the source tells you that a file only exists in some builds. The two worlds drift, because the tagged-out path isn&amp;rsquo;t compiled in your normal editor session and quietly rots. And the ergonomics for a &lt;em&gt;downstream consumer&lt;/em&gt; are poor: every tool built on go-tool-base would have to know the right magic incantation and thread it through their own release pipeline correctly, forever.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tried a second approach too: pull the keychain backend out into a completely separate Go module. That genuinely solves the dependency question (a module you don&amp;rsquo;t require can&amp;rsquo;t contribute to your &lt;code&gt;go.sum&lt;/code&gt;). But a separate module for one backend is clunky. Separate versioning, separate release, separate repo, all for a single file&amp;rsquo;s worth of behaviour. It felt like using a shipping container to post a letter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-shape-that-actually-fits-a-registry-and-an-init"&gt;The shape that actually fits: a registry and an &lt;code&gt;init()&lt;/code&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;The version I&amp;rsquo;m happy with leans on two boring, well-worn Go mechanisms and lets them do something quietly clever together.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, &lt;code&gt;pkg/credentials&lt;/code&gt; defines a &lt;code&gt;Backend&lt;/code&gt; interface and a registry. By default the registry holds a stub backend that politely returns &amp;ldquo;unsupported&amp;rdquo; for everything. The framework only ever talks to &lt;em&gt;the registered backend&lt;/em&gt;, whatever that happens to be.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Second, the keychain implementation lives in its own package, &lt;code&gt;pkg/credentials/keychain&lt;/code&gt;, still inside the same module, no separate release to manage. That package has an &lt;code&gt;init()&lt;/code&gt; that registers its &lt;code&gt;go-keyring&lt;/code&gt;-backed backend:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="highlight"&gt;&lt;pre tabindex="0" class="chroma"&gt;&lt;code class="language-go" data-lang="go"&gt;&lt;span class="line"&gt;&lt;span class="cl"&gt;&lt;span class="cp"&gt;//nolint:gochecknoinits // registration via import is the whole point&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="line"&gt;&lt;span class="cl"&gt;&lt;span class="kd"&gt;func&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nf"&gt;init&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;()&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="line"&gt;&lt;span class="cl"&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nx"&gt;credentials&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nf"&gt;RegisterBackend&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nx"&gt;Backend&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;{})&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="line"&gt;&lt;span class="cl"&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;And &lt;code&gt;go-keyring&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;godbus&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;wincred&lt;/code&gt;, the whole IPC dependency chain, are only imported by &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; package.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now the trick. To switch keychain support on, you import the package. You don&amp;rsquo;t have to &lt;em&gt;use&lt;/em&gt; anything from it. A blank import is enough, because a blank import still runs the package&amp;rsquo;s &lt;code&gt;init()&lt;/code&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="highlight"&gt;&lt;pre tabindex="0" class="chroma"&gt;&lt;code class="language-go" data-lang="go"&gt;&lt;span class="line"&gt;&lt;span class="cl"&gt;&lt;span class="c1"&gt;// cmd/gtb/keychain.go - the entire file.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="line"&gt;&lt;span class="cl"&gt;&lt;span class="kn"&gt;package&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nx"&gt;main&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="line"&gt;&lt;span class="cl"&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="line"&gt;&lt;span class="cl"&gt;&lt;span class="kn"&gt;import&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nx"&gt;_&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="s"&gt;&amp;#34;gitlab.com/phpboyscout/go-tool-base/pkg/credentials/keychain&amp;#34;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;That single line is the on/off switch for the shipped &lt;code&gt;gtb&lt;/code&gt; binary. The blank import means &lt;code&gt;init()&lt;/code&gt; runs, the keychain backend registers itself, and credential operations start routing through the OS keychain. No flag, no tag, no config.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-part-that-makes-it-provable"&gt;The part that makes it provable
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s why this beats the build tag, and it comes down to one guarantee in the Go toolchain: &lt;strong&gt;the linker only includes packages that are actually imported.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If &lt;code&gt;cmd/gtb/keychain.go&lt;/code&gt; exists, the &lt;code&gt;keychain&lt;/code&gt; package is in the import graph, so &lt;code&gt;go-keyring&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;godbus&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;wincred&lt;/code&gt; are linked in. Delete that one file and rebuild, and the &lt;code&gt;keychain&lt;/code&gt; package is no longer reachable from &lt;code&gt;main&lt;/code&gt;. The linker performs dead-code elimination, and the entire &lt;code&gt;go-keyring&lt;/code&gt; chain is &lt;em&gt;gone&lt;/em&gt;. Not dormant. Not present-but-unused. Absent from the binary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;rsquo;s the bit a regulated build needs. It isn&amp;rsquo;t a promise that the code won&amp;rsquo;t run. It&amp;rsquo;s a structural fact that the code isn&amp;rsquo;t there, and you can hand a security reviewer an SBOM that proves it. &lt;code&gt;go-keyring&lt;/code&gt; won&amp;rsquo;t appear, because it genuinely isn&amp;rsquo;t linked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a downstream tool built on go-tool-base the story is the same, and just as cheap. Want keychain support? Add the one-line blank import to your own &lt;code&gt;cmd&lt;/code&gt; package. Must ship keychain-free? Don&amp;rsquo;t. Your binary&amp;rsquo;s dependency graph follows your import graph, exactly as Go always promised it would. The default (no import) is the locked-down one, which is the right way round for a safety property.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="why-i-like-this-more-than-i-expected-to"&gt;Why I like this more than I expected to
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Build tags hide a decision in the compiler invocation. This pattern puts the decision in the source, as an import, where it&amp;rsquo;s greppable, obvious in code review, and impossible to get subtly wrong. There&amp;rsquo;s a real file called &lt;code&gt;keychain.go&lt;/code&gt; whose entire content is one import, and it reads as exactly what it is: a switch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s also just &lt;em&gt;honest&lt;/em&gt; Go. No reflection, no plugin loader, no clever runtime. A registry, an &lt;code&gt;init()&lt;/code&gt;, and the linker doing the one job it&amp;rsquo;s always done. The cleverness, such as it is, is in the arrangement, not in any individual piece.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="stepping-back"&gt;Stepping back
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;go-tool-base needed OS keychain support for the many, and a way to provably exclude it for the few. Build tags could express the toggle but hid it in the build invocation and rotted in the dark. A separate module solved the dependency question but was far too much machinery for one backend.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Putting the keychain backend in its own package, activated by a blank &lt;code&gt;import _&lt;/code&gt; that fires its &lt;code&gt;init()&lt;/code&gt;, gets you both: a one-line, in-source, code-reviewable switch, and, because the linker only links what&amp;rsquo;s imported, a build with the import omitted that contains &lt;em&gt;none&lt;/em&gt; of the keychain dependency chain. Provable absence, not promised disuse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;re carrying an optional dependency that some of your users need gone rather than merely idle, this is the pattern. Let the import graph be the feature flag.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>